A man vents his anger in ten cars in a row and shoots through sentinel mode: the result is very “sad”

June 27 News After all, people have to bear the consequences of their actions.

Media Report Recently, a man in Wuhan lost his family after an argument, actually caught ten cars and parked his wasteland attractions on ten cars on the roadside sippliftions disiplifts sipplift.

What he never expected was that a new energy tool was turning on outpost mode at the time, clearly documenting his criminal process and appearance characteristics, which provided police with a key clue to the resolution of the case, and the owner immediately called the police.

The police quickly identified the suspect Peng and arrested him through searching for videos. After interrogation, Peng admitted that he was in a bad mood recently due to a dispute with his family, so he went out for a walk. He then shaves his anger on the street and shaves ten cars. This behavior not only harms others’ property, but also violates the law.

The police investigation found that the man was released on bail as early as January 2025. Currently, Hongshan police in Wuhan have filed criminal cases against Peng because he caused troubled crimes according to the law. This situation shows that Peng has not learned from previous events, has a weak sense of law and violates the law. Waiting for him would be a severe punishment for the law.

<a href="https://img1.myrivers.com/img/20250627/41939672-C00D-4C9E-4C9E-4C9E-A10D-7482254CED54CED54CED54CED54CED54CED5F.PNG target=" Target=" Target=" Target=" target=" Sentinel Mode: The result is very sad. h = "397" src = "http://aitalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/, the man drove ten cars in a row to vent his anger.

Malicious scratching someone else’s car is intentional vandalism and will be punished according to the degree of losses caused. According to our country’s laws, there are clear sentencing standards for conscious property losses. Different vehicles have different values ​​and different degrees of scratches, and the final sentencing will be different.

Under Article 49 of the Public Safety Administration Punishment Act, if the vehicle damage caused by the scratch is small and does not meet the criminal application standards, if this is an illegal act of intentional damage to public and private property, he will be detained for no less than five days, but not more than ten days, and may be fined no more than five hundred and five hundred. If the situation is serious, he will be detained for no more than ten days, but no more than 15 days, possibly no more than one thousand dollars.

If someone maliciously scratches someone else’s car, causing a large amount of vehicle damage and complies with local application standards, it constitutes a crime of intentional property loss.

According to Article 275 of the Criminal Code, if intentional damage to public and private property is large, or in other serious cases, he shall be sentenced to periodic imprisonment, detention or fine not exceeding three years; if the amount is huge or particularly serious, the person shall be sentenced to fixed imprisonment not exceeding three years but not exceeding seven years.

In judicial practice, if the loss of public and private property is usually caused by more than $5,000, it will be considered a large quantity that can be filed and prosecuted under the law. However, it should be noted that in various places, “big” identification standards may vary and specific requirements need to be transferred to local judicial interpretations and related regulations.

In addition, whether or not a crime is constituted, the car owner has the right to claim a scratching party to compensate for losses such as the cost of the car maintenance. If the vehicle is depreciated due to scratches, the scraper shall bear the corresponding compensation liability after the depreciation amount is determined through professional evaluation. The assessment of the vehicle depreciation part needs to be conducted by a more professional organization to ensure the fairness and objectivity of the assessment.

The two parties can resolve compensation issues through consultation and mediation. This is a relatively peaceful and low-cost solution. However, if negotiations fail, the car owner has the right to file a civil lawsuit in court and to safeguard his legitimate rights and interests through legal means.

exist

exist

免责声明:本网站内容主要来自原创、合作伙伴供稿和第三方自媒体作者投稿,凡在本网站出现的信息,均仅供参考。本网站将尽力确保所提供信息的准确性及可靠性,但不保证有关资料的准确性及可靠性,读者在使用前请进一步核实,并对任何自主决定的行为负责。本网站对有关资料所引致的错误、不确或遗漏,概不负任何法律责任。任何单位或个人认为本网站中的网页或链接内容可能涉嫌侵犯其知识产权或存在不实内容时,可联系本站进行审核删除。
Like (0)
Rain科技Rain科技
Previous 1 day ago
Next 1 day ago

相关推荐

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

欢迎来到AI快讯网,开启AI资讯新时代!