Rainwater Technology reported on June 26 that recently, Chinese betel nut brand Munia (Guangzhou) (Guangzhou) launched the Hechengtianxia & Bentley joint gift box, which has caused heated discussions on the Internet.
According to media reports, Bentley replied that the joint products and related activities have nothing to do with Bentley Brand and its authorized dealers in China, and there is no Bentley brand authorization or endorsement of any form.
Bentley said the Bentley brand has not yet approved the use of the Bentley brand logo in this offline event and online communication.
Bentley Brand reserves the right to take appropriate legal measures to protect the legal rights and interests of the brand.
Data show that betel nut is the fruit of evergreen trees in the tropical palm family. When chewing, betel nut releases betel nut. It can stimulate the nerve center to produce euphoria, so it has become one of the locals’ favorite chewy snacks.
As early as 2004, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a subsidiary of the World Health Organization, listed betel nut as a first-class carcinogen.
Study shows that long-term excessive chewing of betel nut can lead to oral cancer and may lead to esophageal cancer, liver cancer, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, periodontal disease, tooth defects, temporomandibular joint damage, morphological and functional abnormalities of the chin, and even its addictiveness and possible symptoms of Estee.
exist
exist
As public health awareness increases, controversy over betel nut nuts continues, and betel nut nuts are a widespread danger. Recently, the joint gift boxes of Chinese betel nut brands, “Cheng Tianxia” and Bentley (Guangzhou) quickly attracted widespread attention after their launch. However, the development of things is unexpected. Bentley officials quickly issued a statement to clear any links to high-end cross-border cooperation.
Bentley’s response was very clear, pointing out that United Sports and products were not authorized or endorsed by the brand. Not only that, Bentley also stressed that the use of its brand logo is not allowed and the right to take legal measures is reserved. This means Chengtianxia may face infringement charges, and consumers’ trust in joint products will undoubtedly be greatly reduced.
It is worth noting that the separation from Bentley is a stark contrast, which is a dispute between betel nut itself. The safety of betel nut is questioned as the World Health Organization classifies it as a first-class carcinogenic food. Even if there is a tradition of eating betel nut in some areas, its potential health risks cannot be ignored. Long-term chewing of betel nut is significantly associated with many diseases, such as oral cancer.
So, this joint incident inevitably makes people wonder: Why are car brands known for their high-end luxury and high-end luxury goods and cancer risks? Is there any commercial negligence or misleading behind this? Or is this just an unauthorized marketing practice? Regardless of the facts, the incident has once again sparked controversy over betel nuts, and also reminded companies to carefully evaluate the reputation and product risks of their partners when conducting brand collaborations to avoid negative impacts on their brand image. At the same time, consumers are also reminded that they need to study this common brand product more reasonably, rather than blindly pursuing brand effects and ignoring potential health risks.
Rainwater Technology reported on June 26 that recently, Chinese betel nut brand Munia (Guangzhou) (Guangzhou) launched the Hechengtianxia & Bentley joint gift box, which has caused heated discussion on the Internet.
According to media reports, Bentley replied that the joint products and related activities have nothing to do with the Bentley brand and its authorized dealers in China and are not authorized or endorsed by any form of Bentley brand.
Bentley said the Bentley brand has not yet approved the use of the Bentley brand logo during this offline event and online communication.
Bentley Brand reserves the right to take appropriate legal measures to protect the legal rights and interests of the brand.
Data show that betel nut is the fruit of evergreen trees in the tropical palm family. When chewing, betel nut will release betel nut. It can stimulate the nerve center to produce euphoria, so it has become one of the locals’ favorite chewy snacks.
As early as 2004, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a subsidiary of the World Health Organization, listed betel nut as a first-class carcinogen.
Study shows that long-term excessive chewing of betel nut can lead to oral cancer and may lead to esophageal cancer, liver cancer, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, periodontal disease, tooth defects, temporomandibular joint damage, morphological and functional abnormalities of the chin, and even its addictiveness and may cause Este’s symptoms.
exist
exist
As public health awareness increases, the controversy over betel nut nuts continues, and betel nuts are a widespread danger. Recently, the joint gift boxes of Chinese betel nut brands, “Cheng Tianxia” and Bentley (Guangzhou) quickly attracted widespread attention after their launch. However, the development of things is unexpected. Bentley officials quickly issued a statement to clear any connections to what appears to be high-end cross-border cooperation.
Bentley’s response was very clear, pointing out that United Sports and products were not authorized or endorsed by the brand. Not only that, Bentley also stressed that the use of its brand logo is not allowed and the right to take legal measures is reserved. This means Chengtianxia may face infringement charges, and consumers’ trust in joint products will undoubtedly be greatly reduced.
It is worth noting that the separation from Bentley is a stark contrast, which is a dispute between betel nut itself. The safety of betel nut is questioned as the World Health Organization classifies it as a first-class carcinogenic food. Even if there is a tradition of eating betel nut in some areas, its potential health risks cannot be ignored. Long-term chewing of betel nut is significantly associated with many diseases, such as oral cancer.
So, this joint incident inevitably makes people wonder: Why are car brands known for their high-end luxury and high-end luxury and cancer risks? Is there any commercial negligence or misleading behind this? Or is this just an unauthorized marketing practice? Regardless of the facts, the incident has once again sparked controversy over betel nuts, and also reminded companies to carefully evaluate the reputation and product risks of their partners when conducting brand collaborations to avoid negative impacts on their brand image. At the same time, consumers are also reminded that they need to study this common brand product more reasonably, rather than blindly pursuing brand effects and ignoring potential health risks.
Rainwater Technology reported on June 26 that recently, Chinese betel nut brand Munia (Guangzhou) (Guangzhou) launched the Hechengtianxia & Bentley joint gift box, which has caused heated discussions on the Internet.
According to media reports, Bentley replied that the joint products and related activities have nothing to do with the Bentley brand and its authorized dealers in China and have not been authorized or endorsed by any form of Bentley Brand.
Bentley said the Bentley brand has not approved the use of the Bentley brand logo in this offline event and online communication.
Bentley Brand reserves the right to take appropriate legal measures to protect the legal rights and interests of the brand.
Data show that betel nut is the fruit of evergreen trees in the tropical palm family. When chewing, betel nut releases betel nut. It can stimulate the nerve center to produce euphoria, so it has become one of the locals’ favorite chewy snacks.
As early as 2004, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a subsidiary of the World Health Organization, listed betel nut as a first-class carcinogen.
Study shows that long-term excessive chewing of betel nut can lead to oral cancer and can lead to esophageal cancer, liver cancer, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, periodontal disease, tooth defects, temporomandibular joint damage, morphological and functional abnormalities of the chin, and even its addictiveness and may lead to ester symptoms.
exist
exist
The controversy over betel nut nuts continues as public health awareness increases and betel nuts are widespread dangers. Recently, the joint gift boxes of Chinese betel nut brands, “Cheng Tianxia” and Bentley (Guangzhou) quickly attracted widespread attention after their launch. However, the development of things is unexpected. Bentley officials quickly issued a statement to clear any contact with contacts that had a shadow over what seemed to be high-end cross-border collaboration.
Bentley’s response was very clear, pointing out that United Sports and products were not authorized or endorsed by the brand. Not only that, Bentley also stressed that the use of its brand logo is not allowed and the right to take legal measures is reserved. This means Chengtianxia may face infringement charges, and consumers’ trust in joint products will undoubtedly be greatly reduced.
It is worth noting that the separation from Bentley is a stark contrast, which is a dispute between betel nut itself. The safety of betel nut is questioned as the World Health Organization classifies it as a first-class carcinogenic food. Even if there is a tradition of eating betel nut in some areas, its potential health risks cannot be ignored. Long-term chewing of betel nut is significantly associated with many diseases, such as oral cancer.
So, this joint incident inevitably makes people wonder: Why are car brands known for their high-end luxury and high-end luxury goods and products at risk of cancer? Is there any commercial negligence or misleading behind this? Or is this just an unauthorized marketing practice? Regardless of the facts, the incident has once again sparked controversy over betel nuts, and also reminded companies to carefully evaluate the reputation and product risks of their partners when conducting brand collaborations to avoid negative impacts on their brand image. At the same time, consumers are also reminded that they need to study this common brand product more reasonably, rather than blindly pursuing brand effects and ignoring potential health risks.
Rainwater Technology reported on June 26 that recently, Chinese betel nut brand Munia, named Bentley (Guangzhou), launched the Hechengtianxia & Bentley joint gift box, which has caused heated discussion on the Internet.
According to media reports, Bentley replied that the joint products and related activities have nothing to do with the Bentley brand and its authorized dealers in China and have not been authorized or endorsed by the Bentley brand in any form.
Bentley said the Bentley brand has not approved the application of the Bentley brand logo for this offline event and online communication.
Bentley Brand reserves the right to take appropriate legal measures to protect the legal rights and interests of the brand.
Data show that betel nut is the fruit of evergreen trees in the tropical palm family. When chewing, betel nut will release betel nut. It can stimulate the nerve center to produce euphoria, so it has become one of the locals’ favorite chewy snacks.
As early as 2004, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a subsidiary of the World Health Organization, listed betel nut as a first-class carcinogen.
Study shows that long-term excessive chewing of betel nut can lead to oral cancer and can lead to esophageal cancer, liver cancer, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, periodontal disease, tooth defects, temporomandibular joint damage, morphological and functional abnormalities of the chin, and even its addictive and may lead to ester symptoms and adverse symptoms.
exist
exist
Controversy over betel nut nuts has been ongoing with increasing public health awareness and widespread dangers of betel nuts. Recently, the joint gift boxes of Chinese betel nut brands, “Cheng Tianxia” and Bentley (Guangzhou) quickly attracted widespread attention after their launch. However, the development of things is unexpected. Bentley officials quickly issued a statement to clear any contact with contacts, which has a shadow on the seemingly high-end cross-border collaboration.
Bentley’s response was very clear, pointing out that United Sports and products were not authorized or endorsed by the brand. Not only that, Bentley also stressed that the use of its brand logo is not allowed and the right to take legal measures is reserved. This means Chengtianxia may face infringement charges, and consumers’ trust in joint products will undoubtedly be greatly reduced.
It is worth noting that the separation from Bentley is a stark contrast, which is a dispute between betel nut itself. As the World Health Organization classifies it as a first-class carcinogenic food, the safety of betel nut is questioned. Even if there is a tradition of eating betel nut in some areas, its potential health risks cannot be ignored. Long-term chewing of betel nut is significantly associated with many diseases, such as oral cancer.
So, this joint incident inevitably makes people wonder: Why are car brands known for their high-end luxury goods and high-end luxury goods and products at risk of cancer? Is there any commercial negligence or misleading behind this? Or is this just an unauthorized marketing practice? Regardless of the facts, the incident once again sparked controversy over betel nuts, and also reminded companies to carefully evaluate the reputation and product risks of their partners when conducting brand collaborations to avoid negative impacts on their brand image. At the same time, consumers are also reminded that they need to study this common brand product more reasonably, rather than blindly pursuing brand effects and ignoring potential health risks.
Rainwater Technology reported on June 26 that recently, the Chinese betel nut brand, Munia, co-named Bentley (Guangzhou), launched the Hechengtianxia & Bentley joint gift box, which has caused heated discussion on the Internet.
According to media reports, Bentley replied that the joint products and related activities have nothing to do with the Bentley brand and its authorized dealers in China and have not been authorized or endorsed by Bentley Brand in any form.
Bentley said the Bentley brand has not approved the application of the Bentley brand logo in this offline event and online communication.
Bentley Brand reserves the right to take appropriate legal measures to protect the legal rights and interests of the brand.
The data show that betel nut is the fruit of evergreen trees from the tropical palm family. When chewing, betel nut releases betel nut. It can stimulate the nerve center to produce euphoria, so it has become one of the locals’ favorite chewy snacks.
As early as 2004, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a subsidiary of the World Health Organization, listed betel nut as a first-class carcinogen.
Study shows that long-term excessive chewing of betel nut can lead to oral cancer and can lead to esophageal cancer, liver cancer, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, periodontal disease, tooth defects, temporomandibular joint damage, morphological and functional abnormalities of the chin and its addictive nature, and can even lead to estrogen, adverse pregnancy, and adverse symptoms.
exist
exist
With the increasing public health awareness and the widespread danger of betel nuts, controversy over betel nuts has been ongoing. Recently, the joint gift boxes of Chinese betel nut brands, “Cheng Tianxia” and Bentley (Guangzhou) quickly attracted widespread attention after their launch. However, the development of things is unexpected. Bentley officials quickly issued a statement to clear any connections to the contact, which casts a shadow over the seemingly high-end cross-border cooperation.
Bentley’s response was very clear, pointing out that the joint sports and products were not authorized or endorsed by the brand. Not only that, Bentley also stressed that the use of its brand logo is not allowed and the right to take legal measures is reserved. This means Chengtianxia may face infringement charges, and consumers’ trust in the joint product will undoubtedly be greatly reduced.
It is worth noting that the separation of relations with Bentley is in sharp contrast, which is a controversy among betel nut itself. As a food classified as a first-class carcinogen by the World Health Organization, the safety of betel nut is questioned. Even if there is a tradition of eating betel nut in some areas, its potential health risks cannot be ignored. Long-term chewing betel nut is significantly associated with many diseases (such as oral cancer).
So, this joint incident inevitably makes people wonder: Why are car brands known for their high-end luxury goods and products at risk of cancer? Is there any commercial negligence or misleading behind this? Or is this just an unauthorized marketing practice? Regardless of the facts, this incident once again brought the controversy about betel nut, and also reminded companies to carefully evaluate the reputation and product risks of their partners when conducting brand collaborations to avoid negatively affecting their brand image. At the same time, consumers are also reminded that they need to study this common brand product more reasonably and not blindly pursue brand effects and ignore potential health risks.
