New Audi A5L Leaks Oil Everywhere, Owner Denied Refund or Exchange

On October 6th, according to a report by 1818 “Golden Eyes,” Mr. Shao recently purchased a new SAIC Audi A5L with a full payment. However, to his dismay, the vehicle developed an engine oil leak the very next day after purchase.

Mr. Shao stated that he purchased the vehicle from the SAIC Audi 4S dealership in Chenxi Shangao, Hangzhou. The total cost after all fees was 255,900 yuan, for the luxury variant of the SAIC Audi A5L.

However, while driving the next day, a malfunction indicator light illuminated. Upon inspection, a significant amount of engine oil was found to have leaked, leaving noticeable trails on the ground.

New Audi A5L Leaks Engine Oil on First Day; Owner Denied Replacement or Refund

The 4S dealership attributed the issue to a defect or improper installation of the sealing ring connecting the engine and the turbocharger. Their proposed solution was to repair the leak.

New Audi A5L Leaks Engine Oil on First Day; Owner Denied Replacement or Refund

Mr. Shao expressed his dissatisfaction, arguing that as a brand-new vehicle purchased with full payment, it should not have presented with such a significant issue so soon. His demand was for a replacement with a completely new and fault-free vehicle.

In response, the 4S dealership explained that a sealing ring on an external oil pipe was slightly compromised, causing the engine oil to seep out. They elaborated that due to the oil pressure, the oil would naturally flow through this connection, whether for intake or return. The dealership reiterated their offer to replace the sealing ring.

New Audi A5L Leaks Engine Oil on First Day; Owner Denied Replacement or Refund

The dealership further explained that if the customer’s concern was about pressure causing the issue, replacing the seal with a new one should resolve it. However, they stated that if the pressure remained abnormal, it could still breach the new seal. They also pointed out that according to the “three guarantees” policy (consumer product warranty regulations), a direct vehicle replacement might not be applicable in this scenario, as the customer rejected the repair verification process and insisted on a new car.

Mr. Shao remained unwilling to accept the dealership’s proposed solution. He raised concerns about the potential long-term impact of a complete engine oil loss on the engine’s performance and lifespan. His sole demand remained a vehicle replacement.

The dealership indicated that after the repair, they could conduct re-testing or offer a complimentary servicing. However, they were unable to provide guarantees for future performance. Mr. Shao found this unsatisfactory and is considering consulting a third-party inspection agency before deciding on his next steps.

免责声明:本网站内容主要来自原创、合作伙伴供稿和第三方自媒体作者投稿,凡在本网站出现的信息,均仅供参考。本网站将尽力确保所提供信息的准确性及可靠性,但不保证有关资料的准确性及可靠性,读者在使用前请进一步核实,并对任何自主决定的行为负责。本网站对有关资料所引致的错误、不确或遗漏,概不负任何法律责任。任何单位或个人认为本网站中的网页或链接内容可能涉嫌侵犯其知识产权或存在不实内容时,可联系本站进行审核删除。
(0)
Rain科技Rain科技
上一篇 2025年 10月 6日 下午7:03
下一篇 2025年 10月 6日 下午9:01

相关推荐

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

欢迎来到AI快讯网,开启AI资讯新时代!